Mercenaries in Ukraine, Tourism Declines – State Press Digest
The Belarusian authorities threaten mercenaries originating from Belarus who participate in the Ukraine conflict with large prison terms. Belarusians cancel their New Year tourist plans because of terror attacks at popular tourist destinations.
The trade ministry tries to regulate the rapidly growing sector of online commerce. The hotel sector in Minsk faces hard times. The government plans to introduce changes to immigration rules.
All of this and more in the new edition of the Belarus State Press Digest.
Mercenaries from Belarus who participate in the Ukrainian conflict can receive up to 7 years in prison. Narodnaja Hazieta discusses the problem of Belarusian mercenaries, who undermine the authorities' peacekeeping efforts and provoke the continuation of armed conflict in search of income. It points to the recent case of a mercenary who fought for the Ukrainian Right Sector and was recently arrested at Minsk railway station in possession of weapons and explosives. The newspaper compares the Belarusian fighters with ISIS radicals. However, it mentions only mercenaries who fight on the side of Ukraine, while being silent on the pro-Russian fighters. According to the Belarusian security services, the numbers of both groups are the same.
This year few Belarusians wish to travel to Western Europe and Egypt for New Year. The companies admit that recent attacks on popular tourist destinations have discouraged their customers from travelling, writes Belarus Segodnya. They prefer to sit at home rather than risk their lives. Stable interest remains only for tours in the Baltic countries and Scandinavia. Meanwhile, inbound tourism remains almost entirely dependent on the Russian market, which fell by 40 per cent this year. Currently Russians often prefer to spent a holiday in their own country, where some excellent health resorts are emerging.
More than 700 applicants from across the country participated in the first competition for local initiatives under the EU/UNDP project. Overall, the jury approved 87 projects within the Support to Local Development in the Republic of Belarus programme. In Mahilioŭ region 17 institutions and organisations have received financial support to put forward their ideas: from popularising traditional handicrafts to the festival of folk art. Siel'skaya Gazeta reports on the grant winners from Kličaŭ district, who put forward a business project of greenhouse vegetable production and received full support from the local authorities during the application procedure. Environmentally friendly production was one of the conditions of the UN grant programme.
Ministry of Trade will strengthen control over online commerce. Zviazda newspaper published a number of initiatives that the Ministry of Trade will take to regulate the rapidly growing sector. The authorities are discussing a tax on purchases in foreign online shops. Social media also appeared in focus because the goods and services advertised there are often illegal or fail to meet quality standards. The online alcohol trade in Belarus is likely to largely disappear in the near future, as the Ministries of Health and the Interior oppose it. The government also plans to launch an attestation for internet shops which sell electronics like laptops and mobile phones, which make up a vast shadow market. This year 35 internet shops were closed by the order of the ministry for violation of law.
Belarusians show low use of banking services. Belarus Segodnya analyses the research ordered by the National Bank in September, which reveals curious tendencies in the financial behaviour of the Belarusian population. Belarusians are considered to be prudent, cautious and thrifty, but the results of the study call this view into question. Almost one in ten Belarusians do not use banking services at all. Only 21.5 per cent of the population and less than a third of households invest their savings in banks. Meanwhile, every fourth Belarusian, and almost 40 per cent of households use bank loans, and the figures have been the same for the last few years. The study concludes that Belarus is a country with relatively low use of financial services.
Hotel business in Minsk faces hard times. Although competition on the hotel market is growing year by year, prices remain quite high and the quality of service low, Respublika newspaper reports. 2015 and especially the beginning of the year were tough for hotels, as the number of tourists from Russia fell sharply. Today the sector is divided into successful and unsuccessful hotels, where the former have sufficient number of customers and the latter critically lack them. The hotels expect to increase the flow of tourists through the ever-changing geopolitical environment around Belarus. Otherwise, less successful hotels will suffer even more as competition in the market increases. In the next two years 15 new hotels are expected to appear in Minsk.
Belarusian authorities plan to check migrants' knowledge of the Constitution. At first this will only apply when obtaining citizenship, Souyz newspaper reports. In 2015 the flow of migrants increased markedly, and 1,160 people from 23 countries applied for refugee status. Most of them come from Ukraine (75%), Syria (17%) and Afghanistan. Although the largest number of Ukrainian refugees settled in Russia, Belarus took most if counted per capita. About 150,000 Ukrainian citizens arrived in Belarus in the last two years, according to the Interior Ministry.
Administration of the Brest Fortress memorial complex is worried about the increase in illegal guided tours. Zaria newspaper from Brest reports on the tricks of illegal guides in Brest Fortress, a memorial famous across the post-Soviet world. Unlicensed guides recruit tourist groups via the Internet, catch them near hotels, or even in the territory of the memorial. If approached, they argue that they simply walk with their relatives or friends, and the facts of payment for the service is hard to spot. The administration argues that illegal guides discredit the image of the Soviet defenders, the memorial, the residents of the city and Brest itself by their unprofessionalism. Many of them do not even know the key dates of history and confuse simple facts.
The State Digest Digest is based on review of state-controlled publications in Belarus. Freedom of the press in Belarus remains restricted and state media convey primarily the point of view of the Belarusian authorities. This review attempts to give the English-speaking audience a better understanding of howBelarusian state media shape public opinion in the country.
Academics Debating Belarus in Philadelphia: Between Facts and Fictions
The 47th Annual Convention of the Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies (ASEEES), held on 19 – 22 November 2015 in Philadelphia, offered new interpretations of the contemporary situation in Belarus.
Reflecting on the presidential campaign of 2015 and a lack of genuine interest from the West in its outcome, discussions highlighted the impact of the unstable international situation in the region on the political attitudes of the Belarusian society.
Belarusian Topics in Philadelphia
ASEEES conventions rank among the most significant international conferences in the field of Slavic studies. Spanning over four days and 14 sessions, with over 40 panels running simultaneously during each session, this year's Convention represented a global platform for the exchange of ideas, networking, and dissemination of the newest research trends.
In 2015 the Belarusian theme surfaced at the Convention in various contexts. For instance, the prestigious Kulczycki Book Prize in Polish Studies has been awarded to Per Rudling's book The Rise and Fall of Belarusian Nationalism, 1906 – 1931, published by the University of Pittsburgh press in 2014. However, only one panel at this year's ASEEES was dedicated entirely to Belarus.
The 2015 theme of the Convention was “Fact,” encouraging the participants to focus on accuracy, objectivity, and high-quality research. The emphasis on the need to keep distance from the ideological considerations appeared to be especially relevant for discussions in the field of Belarusian studies, which revealed two trends: first, the field remains underrepresented at academic events of this scale, and second, it is not always free from the influence of subjective approaches.
Organised by Grigory Ioffe, professor of geography at Radford University (US), the panel “Understanding Belarus” fell into the interdisciplinary category. The panelists included Ioffe himself, Stephen White of the University of Glasgow (UK), and Oleg Manaev, affiliated with the University of Tennessee and the Independent Institute of Socio-Economic and Political Studies (IISEPS, Belarus). The panel dealt with the analysis of the 2015 presidential electoral campaign and the impact of the Ukrainian crisis on regional and international politics.
Drawing on the Convention's overarching theme of “Fact,” the presentations of Stephen White and Oleg Manaev relied heavily on numerical data and results of sociological polls and surveys. Seeking explanations of the reasons for the political stability of the Belarusian regime, White turned to the social aspect and the unique scheme employed by the Belarusian government in order to maintain its positive image.
White’s presentation relied on the recent sociological surveys of the Belarusian society, conducted by David Rotman at the Centre for Sociological and Political Studies of the Belarusian State University. Regrettably, the methodologies and reliability of these sources have not been addressed in a sufficient manner. The current regime's reliance on “market socialism,” a rejection of austerity measures, and keeping social differences in check, along with the maintenance of social justice principles emerged as preconditions of its longevity.
At the same time, White noted that according to the recent survey data, Belarusians were becoming less egalitarian, compared to other post-Communist states, thus suggesting that the government's scheme on continued reliance on the “social state model” might not hold as strong as previously, especially in the conditions of growing economic problems.
Oleg Manaev offered his interpretation of Lukashenka's dominance on the Belarusian political scene. His analysis of the recent electoral campaign was based on the independent opinion polls conducted by the IISEPS.
Manaev tried to answer the question of whether elections of 2015 represented a so-called “point of bifurcation,” or in other words, whether the Belarusian regime has reached a critical point beyond which it could turn unstable. Expectedly, conclusions were negative.
Despite continuing decrease of incomes during 2015 and considerable levels of anxiety amongst the Belarusians about the future, the foundations of the Belarusian political regime remained stable. According to the poll data, the majority of people tended to blame external actors, such as Europe and Russia, rather than seeing the faults of the Belarusian regime.
Manaev demonstrated a more critical approach to the sociological surveys in Belarus, addressing a problem of the post-Soviet mentality of the Belarusian people, which influenced their perceptions of opinion poll questions. For instance, about one half of respondents expressed confidence that elections would be free and fair, yet obviously their understanding of “free and fair” could not conform to the the commonly accepted standards in the democratic states.
Facts or Fictions?
Grigory Ioffe's contribution, entitled “Belarus and its East Slavic Neighbourhood” appeared to have been more controversial and problematic. Ioffe attempted to offer highlights of the Belarusian regime's achievements in 2015, to the detriment of a more critical analysis. Noting the influence of the Ukrainian crisis and growing instability in the region, he suggested that Belarus managed to extract all possible benefits from this situation and that it had overcome its international isolation.
Unfortunately, Ioffe's argumentation did not offer a lot in terms of the Convention's theme of “Fact.” For instance, the provocative assertion that Belarus apparently is “more culturally Russian than Russia itself,” only paraphrased the notorious words of Lukashenka, failing to provide a proper historical justification for such claims.
Even more surprising was the argument for a successful ongoing Belarusian rapprochement with the West, solely based on the examples of the German Chancellor Angela Merkel's and French President Francois Hollande's visits in Minsk in February 2015. Yet Ioffe chose to omit the circumstances of the visits, since the only purpose of the latter were negotiations to settle the Ukrainian crisis, while Belarus merely served as a host to the talks.
Finally, the optimistic comment on the end of Belarusian isolation did not specify that asset freeze and travel bans have not been lifted, but only temporarily suspended as a reaction to the release of political prisoners in August. That serves as an encouragement of further progress in the human rights situation and not as a recognition of the Belarusian regime. In this context, Ioffe's optimistic belief that “Western funding would be resumed” appeared to lack a proper argument, leaving the audience pondering over the question, whether “understanding Belarus” could be that straightforward.
Despite the obvious trends towards generalisations, the panelists agreed that the current political regime, and to a lesser degree the majority of the population, continue to think in terms of internal stability and reluctance to venture out of the existent status quo, especially given the changing geopolitical situation in 2015.
Next Convention of ASEEES is scheduled to take place in Washington, DC in November 2016. It will be centred on the theme of “Global Conversations.” Online submissions of proposals, including individual papers, panels, and roundtables are due by 15 February 2016.