Limits of Religious Tolerance: Protestantism in Belarus
Last month New Life, a Protestant Church in Minsk, celebrated its victory: the authorities allowed them to pray in the cowshed. Over the last five years, this Protestant community had to go through over 30 court hearings and their success has a bitter aftertaste.
Protestantism in Belarus undergoes a renaissance. Albeit the Protestant communities appear to be the fastest-growing, the case of the New Life proves how the authorities make their life difficult. Today restrictive legal framework hinders activities and growth of Protestant churches.
The authorities create obstacles which prevent Protestants from obtaining buildings for prayers and unfriendly attitude of the state media clearly raise the question of equality between the particular confessions before the law and freedom of confession in Belarus.
According to official figures, the number of registered Protestant communities in Belarus is 1,005. The biggest churches remain Evangelic, Pentecostals and Baptists. In comparison with 1,545 Orthodox churches and 475 Roman-Catholic parishes, number of Protestant communities grows fast.
An activist from a Protestant church in Minsk explained to Belarus Digest that the growth reflects the nature of Belarusians as the post-Soviet society, which after the communism started to recognise their spiritual needs.
Whereas, number of Protestant is substantial, the authorities and the state media refrain from calling them ‘churches'. They usually prefer to refer to them as ‘communities’ or ‘religious organisations’. Interesting, that the Belarusian word ‘carkva’, literally meaning ‘the church’, is reserved for use only for the Orthodox Church in Belarus.
Although the tradition of Protestantism in Belarus dates back to the 16th century, the authorities treat it today as non-traditional bearers of foreign political and cultural influence. Even the schoolbooks depict the Protestant confessions as sects which endanger Belarusian state and society.
The lack of proper buildings for the prayer can easily serve as evidence of ‘inappropriate’ and ‘suspicious’ activities of the Protestants. Without access to public media, it is almost impossible to explain wrongfulness and harmfulness of such propaganda.
To Pray but Where?
The lack of the venues to pray remains one of the top problems for Belarusian protestants. Complicated procedures, unpredictable responses from the local authorities, unachievable prices often complicate functioning of protestant churches.
The parishes are lucky if they get the right from the local authorities to rent a building at reasonable prices. It is extremely difficult to register a new church building for Protestant communities. The case of the New Life church which had to fight over its building for the prayer iilustrates this problem.
It started in 2005 when the community lost the right to use further the building, the cowshed adopted for the house for the prayer. The local authorities took a few attempts to resettle the church. In 2010, the community got the fine of 258 mln BYR for the ‘environment pollution’. A battle over the cowshed between the authorities and the New Life Church continued.
To express their support with the church, in October 2012, the leaders of other Protestant churches in Belarus petitioned the head of the Presidential Administration. However, the authorities refrained from enforcement of the decision scheduled for December.
This probably does not let the community to be sure that problems like that will not appear in the future. However, through petitioning and exposure in the international public opinion, the Protestants’ leaders proved they understood the power of legal instruments.
The authorities continue to reduce the number of permissions to rent land plots. Without it, official registration of buildings cannot be completed. Restrictive legislation pushes churches outside of legal boundaries.
Protestants’ Problems Echoed in the West
The 2002 law on religion formally introduced inequality of confessions in Belarus. It described the Orthodox Church as having a special role for the Belarusian society. Aleksandr Lukashenka constantly underlines the 'spiritual brotherhood' with Russia and the role of the Orthodox Church.
For example, during visit of Patriarch Kirill of Moscow to Minsk he said: “Your ambition to preserve the unity of the Russian Orthodox Church and our Slavonic brotherhood deserves high praise. This idea fully meets the hopes of the peoples of Belarus, Russia and Ukraine”.
The law on religions put also restrictions on the right of religious organisations to provide religious education. It confirmed the state censorship on import and distribution of religious literature which also rouse controversy.
The Office of the Plenipotentiary Representative for Religious and Nationalities Affairs of Belarus has a right to reject a registration of any church or religious organisation. The lack of registration makes further activity illegal. Obtaining the permission to build the church is also difficult. In 2010, the local authorities did not allow Protestant community from Navapolatsk to build a church building.
Foreign governments ans international advocy groups have already reacted to the deteriorating situation of the Protestants in Belarus. In a 2011 report, the US Department criticised the 2002 law as ‘oppressive by European standards’. Moreover, the report raises the issue of ‘an extensive bureaucracy that closely supervises the religious life’. The US 2011 International Religious Freedom Report was also very critical about the situation with the freedom of consciousness in Belarus.
In 2009, the European Parliament passed a resolution related to the human rights in Belarus calling to guarantee religious freedom in Belarus. But as it often happens international calls remained unheard in Minsk.
Protestants Tolerated but…
By playing with renting of prayer buildings the authorities keep the protestants far from the public sphere. Perhaps the growing number of protestants and the difficulty of controlling diverse and decentralised communities worries the authorities the most.
This attitude destroys the image of Belarus as a state of religious coexistence and tolerance, which the authorities often cherish in public speeches.
Why Belarus Officials Do Not Blog – Digest of Belarusian Analytics
Experts discuss issues ranging from the presence of officials on social networks to the catalogue of old Belarusian cemeteries.
Governmental Websites One Decade Behind: Svabodaby.net journalist and media expert Pauliuk Bykouski discuss why Belarusian officials do not have blogs and pages in Facebook, as well as what can contribute to the information openness of state agencies. The main conclusion is that because Belarusian officials are not elected they are not particularly interested in impressing the population and building public profiles. The article also provides a brief review of websites of ministries and both chambers of the Parliament of Belarus.
Ioffe about Belarusian Politics and Economy: Liberal Club conducted video-interview with Grigory Ioffe, Radford University Professor, while his visiting Minsk. Prof Ioffe shared his vision of democracy in the world and in Belarus; specifics of "Belarusian regime"; his impressions of his latest meeting with Alexander Lukashenka. In particular, Ioffe considers Lukashenka as an extremely dynamic and flexible person who responds to the changing socio-economic environment; the question is how radically Lukashenka is ready to change.
Asking Questions to Lukashenka. Survival School – Alexander Klaskovsky, following the recent press conference of Lukashenka, gives advice to journalists how to work effectively in such format. The expert believes that the professional and psychological tricks help to talk with a sophisticated manipulator with high status. In addition, journalists also must have a charge of civil courage, because "journalist in Belarus is more than a journalist".
Optimistic about Belarus? – Edward Lucas, European Voice, considers Belarus' regime as "a dark disgrace for Europe" but believes that it is possible to be hopeful for change – not because the opposition is strong, but because the regime is looking weak. He notes that inviting Belarusians where possible to events in EU countries, and visiting Belarus whenever possible, all help breach the sense of isolation that sustains the disgraceful regime.
Results of the 2012 on the Version of the Editors of Analytical Information E-Resources – CSOs websites' editors and journalists discussed the key events of 2012, which received most coverage on their web platforms. The discussion was attended by representatives of EuroBelarus, online magazine "New Europe", Alternative Youth Platform", "Nashe Mnenie".
Belarus: Pulling the Plug (by Index on Censorship) – Index on Censorship prepared a policy paper on digital challenges to freedom of expression in Belarus. The document evaluates most up-to-date data, legal and technical background, and gives recommendations to Belarusian authorities on how to ensure freedom of expression online.
Review of Development in Politics, Business Life and Regions in Belarus in 2012 – Solidarity with Belarus’ Information Office summed up the results of 2012 and concluded that the most notable trends in Belarusian politics were the relative influence enhancement of the Administration of President and Alexander Lukashenka personally with the overall reduction of the government machine controllability and transition to "manual" management methods; an unsettled crisis in the relations with the EU and the U.S.
Youth Participation in the Youth Policy – the policy brief authored by Alternative Youth Platform’s experts presents a description of opportunities for youth participation in the development of the state youth policy in four countries – Russia, Poland, Finland and Belarus. The analysis shows that, although the involvement of young people in political decision-making is seen as an imperative of youth policy, an effective solution is not found in any of these countries.
Foreign Policy Index, November – December of 2012: BISS presents the 11th issue of Belarus’ Foreign Policy Index, which examines five areas of Belarus’s foreign policy in the November-December of 2012. The experts not only assess the foreign policy vectors in their annual dynamics, but also tried to forecast the development of the foreign policy of Belarus in 2013. One of the most important findings is that China is gradually taking place of the EU in a "policy of maneuvering" of the official Minsk.
Ulad Vialichka: Relations of Belarus and EU Should Change – this forecast after evaluation of the relation of EU and our country shared the chairman of the International Consortium "EuroBelarus" Ulad Vialichka. He believes that in 2012 Belarus did not become “more European country”. Moreover, the last year pushed Belarus away from Europe rather than bring closer to it.
The Future Role of Civil Society: The report is the outcome of an eight-month project, in collaboration with KPMG International and involving over 200 leaders and experts, looking at how trends in technology, politics, society, economics and the environment are affecting the evolution of civil society and its implications for stakeholders. The report presents the main global trends impacting the relationships between sectors, highlights the value that civil society provides and explores how the role of civil society might change over the coming two decades as a result.
Main Development Trends of Gomel Region CSOs. November-December 2012 – Gomel Regional Development Agency "Strategic Thought" started publishing the results of monitoring of the Gomel third sector. The monitoring will be conducted quarterly and cover the CSOs’ events that take place in Gomel region, as well as their media coverage.
Anonymous Donations in Belarus: Ways to Improve the Regulatory – Yury Chausov (The NGO Assembly) and Olga Smolyanko (Lawtrend) present analysis and specific recommendations on possible improvements to the legal regulation of charitable activities in Belarus through simplification and liberalisation of donations procedure. The paper was prepared with the BPPF support.
The First Interactive Catalogue of Old Belarusian Cemeteries (in BY language) has become a great tool for historians and those Belarusians interested in their family tree. The map was developed for free by IT young specialists, led by youth NGO Falanster. Earlier they announced a call for proposals among CSOs for IT products which could advance civic issues, received 10 projects and selected the cemeteries as the most promising.
Belarus Digest prepared this overview on the basis of materials provided by Pact. This digest attempts to give a richer picture of the recent political and civil society events in Belarus. It often goes beyond the hot stories already available in English-language media.