Belarusians in World Values Survey: East or West?
In February 2015 following the negotiations in Minsk the President of Belarus said he was not planning to “turn to the West.” He explained, “You and I are Russian people… we have shared history. We have shared opinions.”
According to the recently released World Value Survey (WVS), Belarusians and Russians indeed have a lot in common. Respondents in both countries perceive democracy as less important than respondents in West European states.They have become more religious in the last two decades and are much more focused on economic security.
Belarusians’ survey responses seem to reflect the quest for stability and aversion to political change inculcated by Russian and Belarusian media.
Headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden, WVS consists of almost 100 nationally representative surveys conducted with nearly 400,000 respondents. In Belarus, the survey was administered by the Centre for Sociological and Political Researches at Belarusian State University.
Does Democracy Matter?
WVS results suggest that Belarusians differ from EU citizens most when it comes to politics.
When asked to rank the importance of democracy on a ten-point scale, from absolutely important to not at all important, only a quarter of Belarusians chose the former. For comparison, nearly two thirds of German respondents and half of Polish respondents said democracy was absolutely important.
Both Belarusians and Poles were of low opinion about democracy in the 1990s. In the 1995-1999 survey wave, one fifth of respondents in each states strongly agreed with the statement “while democracy has problems it's better than any other form of government.” Over time, democracy has grown on the Poles, but not on their eastern neighbours.
The predominance of Russian-language media may be partly to blame. Belarusians watch Russian TV channels, surf Russian websites, and purchase Russian newspapers. State-owned channels tell them that democracy has already arrived in the post-Communist space and this democracy is of superior quality to the Western variety. In fact, even the Communist authorities used to call their political arrangement a "People's Democracy."
The meaning of democracy also varies across states. Relatively few Belarusians believe that choosing leaders in free elections constitutes an essential feature of democracy. Free elections are twice as important in Germany and Sweden, for example. Lukashenka would agree. In 2011 he told The Washington Post, “There is no less democracy in Belarus than there is in the United States.”
Furthermore, only 30% of Belarusian respondents said they believe that "civil rights that protect people’s liberty from state oppression" are essential for a democracy.
Interestingly, Belarusians concur with West-European respondents that democracy is not about equal incomes or soaking the rich. Perhaps due to greater inequality and conspicuousness of “oligarchy” in Ukraine and Russia, respondents from these states put more emphasis on economic redistribution.
Belarus on a Conservative Rebound?
As Maxim Trudolyubov noted in the February 2014 New York Times op-ed, religiosity is on the rise in the post-Communist states. WVS allows to compare religiosity between the 1981 and 2007 waves, as measured by the question on the importance of God.
Seven of eight states showing the greatest gains in religious faith are post-Communist: Russia, China, Belarus, Bulgaria, Serbia and Romania, Ukraine and Moldova. By contrast, religiosity has steadily declined in Western Europe. As Europeans grew richer, they went to church less and less.
Social scientists Ronald Inglehart and Pippa Norris explain the rise of religiosity in Eastern Europe by the combination of decreased economic and physical security and the collapse of Marxist ideology. Turning to religion in hard economic times, people in Belarus, Ukraine, and Russia are also reacting against the Soviet atheism policy.
The revival of religious faith has not gone unnoticed by the Belarusian state and opposition alike.
Imitating the Kremlin, Lukashenka frequently rails against the “degradation of Western morals.” For example, at the January 2015 Spiritual revival award ceremony, the President emphasised that “adherence to Christian values, morality, and aesthetic tradition is one of the main factors for the development of the Belarusian nation, preservation of its unity.” He described Belarus as an island of peace at the time when “the wave of international, inter-confessional conflicts and terrorist threats has engulfed the entire world.”
Some Belarusian opposition leaders seem to share Lukashenka’s sentiments. Vital Rymašeŭski of Belarusian Christian Democracy promotes “Christianity against Dictatorship” even as he rails against homosexuals. Paval Seviarynec of Malady Front in 2013 claimed that “the Bible is key to Belarusian National Idea” and in 2012 expressed concern about the “lost” believers from non-Christian traditions.
In contrast to Lukashenka, who calls himself “Orthodox atheist” and supports the Church in exchange for concrete political benefits, Rymašeŭski and Seviarynec are speaking their minds.
Growing religiosity makes Belarusians vulnerable to influence – not only from the Belarusian state or from conservative opposition leaders, but also from the Kremlin’s “Orthodox empire.”
Luckily, even as religious faith is experiencing a revival, it plays only a small role in Belarusian society. Only 16% of Belarusian WSV respondents viewed religion as “very important.” What is more, only 59% of Belarusians are Orthodox Christians. Religious pluralism as well as widespread atheism may be the surest bulwark against the encroachments of the “Russian world”.
Seeking Economic Security Above All
Social scientists have noted that respondents in post-Communist states differ from respondents in industrialised Western states in the predominance of the so-called survival (as opposed to post-materialist) values.
The survival values focus on economic and physical security. Once basic security needs are met, post-materialist priorities of self-expression and mental well-being come to the fore, according to Inglehart.
Post-materialist, liberal values have weak grounding in Belarusian society. Over 77% of Belarusian respondents, for example, viewed economic growth as their country’s most important priority, more important than, for example, “seeing that people have more say in how jobs are done in their communities” or than “making cities and countryside more beautiful.”
Preoccupation with material circumstances can be explained by the poor state of Belarus’s economy. As incomes rise, concerns about the quality of life, environmental issues, and human rights may begin replacing preoccupation with economic conditions.
East or West?
School textbooks in Belarus routinely emphasise the country’s location in the heart of Europe. On social media Belarusians themselves seem ambivalent. Some emphasise the country’s innate Europeanness and blame its current backwardness on Russian imperialism and Lukashenka’s leadership. Others rail against the depravity of the West and extol Belarus’s Slavic, Orthodox heritage.
Results from the recent WVS wave show what Belarusian and West Europeans have in common and what divides them. The Communist past and the authoritarian present have left a deep imprint on Belarusians’ attitudes and beliefs.
Out of step with their Western counterparts, Belarusians are becoming more religious, privilege economic security above other concerns, and remain suspicious of democracy. If Belarusians continue to consume Russian media, they and Russians will find more and more to talk about.
The New Economics without Oil – Belarus Economy Digest
Belarus is reeling from the effects of the wobbling oil price and Western-imposed sanctions on Russia.
The economy is now paying for the absence of liberal reforms through a decrease in manufacturing, the depreciation of the national currency and the need for budget cuts. The lack of good economic and political news suggests that the recovery will take a long time.
But approaching the bottom provides an opportunity to fix bad economic policies and to build a new economic structure using innovative technologies.
Belarusian Version of Contraction
The first economic figures of the new year look far from promising. On 16 of February 2015 Belarus reported that its industrial production fell by 6.2 per cent in the year to January and approximated a $3.7bn loss.
The indicator shows that manufacturing is shrinking. But a number of analysts have pointed out that the Belarusian official industrial production indicator displays some predictable seasonal variations. That complicates any attempt to line the numbers up.
From this point of view the resulting figures on month-on-month changes are especially upsetting. Industrial production has crumbled under the pressure of Russia's economic malaise with this indicator sinking for three months in a row: 2.7 per cent decline in November, 1.7 per cent – in December and the recent 3.9 per cent drop in January. Industry wants to see fewer taxes, cheaper energy and less bureaucracy. On these things the government is moving too slowly, if at all.
Russia is Belarus's Biggest Economic Partner – and Its Most Difficult One
Although the latest figures show industrial production decreasing substantially, it has been flat for the first half of the year. Economic growth is still unviable, with GDP increasing by 1.6 per cent in 2014. But consumer demand remains robust, rising 18.2 per cent in December and overall by 6.6 per cent last year. A bigger share of the market is going to importers (Russia in particular) (see chart).
Imports of cars from Russia rose over threefold in 2014 due to Russia's ruble depreciation. But the new year has seen the ban on importing European vegetables and fruit upheld. Furthermore, Belarusian transit companies trying to export to Kazakhstan face steep non-tariff barriers on these goods, such as from 30 November 2014 the transit of food through the territory of Russia is permitted only through check-points on the Russian border of the Customs Union.
For the moment Belarus is moving towards administratively managed trade with Russia, at least in some sectors despite a free trade agreement.
Belarus is short of cash. Without fresh bail-out money, it faces a serious problem with its public debt. In 2014 Belarus had to repay $2.4bn of foreign government debt. But today the pressures on the country is even more acute. Its economy will need to reimburse $4bn of foreign debt; however it does not know how and where to obtain the entire amount.
According to the 2015 budget, Belarus will ramp up $1.9bn from saved duties on petroleum products produced using Russian crude oil and from exporting Belarusian oil. In order to finance other parts of the debt it plans to use new intergovernmental loans, borrowings on foreign markets and increases in tax proceeds.
The government might impose a special duty for the right to export oil, increase excise taxes on tobacco and alcohol, and raise VAT and income tax rates. In 2015 Belarus is attempting to sustain a budget surplus, and to cut its debt burden. But then again these prospects have darkened further. More immediately, Belarus has asked for $2.5bn loan from Russia this year.
However, whatever happens, the failings of the Customs Union should not have a chance to happen. Russian authorities according to the Russian Minister of Finance Anton Siluanov agreed to provide financial support for Belarus in 2015. That would give them the painfully obvious leverage to influence the country’s decisions after the Belarusian elections, possibly this year or early next year, in order to further deepen economic and political integration.
More Taxes for Belarusians: Good or Bad?
The Belarusian authorities have called for “spongers” (people who do not officially work, but earn substantial profit) to “pay their fair share”. They think the Belarusian “rich” should pay more taxes. The government’s decision is on the way. A one-time fee on about the 500 thousand able-bodied Belarusian citizens officially not working, not paying taxes and who do not participate in the financing of public expenditures, but at the same time enjoy the social benefits provided by the state soon will become the norm.
able-bodied citizens, who for more than six months paid no taxes will be required to pay an annual fee of around $250 Read more
According to the draft decree on the promotion of employment, able-bodied citizens, who for more than six months paid no taxes will be required to pay an annual fee of around $250. Evasion, untimely or incomplete payment of the fee will be subject to administrative liability. However, establishing such a tax fee is not the best way of extracting extra money for the budget. It would raise revenues of about 0.16 per cent of GDP and do nothing to make the exceptionally complicated Belarusian tax system more efficient.
According to the new tax rules effective from 2015, some personal debts are now subject to tax. First of all, it applies to individuals who have received a loan or credit from other individuals (not individual entrepreneurs), from foreign organisations that do not have representative offices in Belarus, or from foreign entrepreneurs.
Second, the new rules apply only in cases when citizens bought something expensive (car, real estate, so on), but his personal income does not cover costs. If the declaration indicates that the acquisition is made with borrowed money, then it will be liable to income tax except for loans from Belarusian organisations (banks and other financial organisations) and individual entrepreneurs. Finally, tax does not apply to money borrowed from relatives.
Many independent economists agree that imposing any additional taxes would not create jobs, but would harm business and social confidence. They think the country can fill the budget hole also by spending cuts, saying that deficit reduction works best when most of the burden falls on it. That means that middle-class entitlements will have to be reduced, no matter what the tax supporters say. The result would be lower rates, more revenue and a more efficient and progressive tax system.
Aleh Mazol, Belarusian Economic Research and Outreach Center (BEROC)
This article is a part of a joint project between Belarus Digest and Belarusian Economic Research and Outreach Center (BEROC)